- December 10, 2006
- December 20, 2006
- August 7, 2006
- July 26, 2006
- July 16, 2006
- July 16, 2006
- July 16, 2006
- July 14, 2006
- June 6, 2006
- April 20, 2006
- March 25, 2006
- December 20, 2005
- December 19, 2005
- December 7, 2005
- December 4, 2005
- November 29, 2005
- November 28, 2005
- November 27, 2005
- November 28, 2005
- November 27, 2005
- November 25, 2005
- November 20, 2005
- November 20, 2005
- November 21, 2005
- November 5, 2005
- September 23, 2005
- September 1, 2005
- August 9, 2005
- July 23, 2005
- July 18, 2005
- June 21, 2005
- June 21, 2005
- June 17, 2005
- June 16, 2005
- June 12, 2005
- June 7, 2005
- May 25, 2005
- May 18, 2005
- March 16, 2005
- April 18, 2005
- April 11, 2005
- March 23, 2005
- March 22, 2005
- March 21, 2005
- March 21, 2005
- March 16, 2005
- March 12, 2005
- March 12, 2005
- February 16, 2005
- February 7, 2005
- February 4, 2005
- January 27, 2005
- January 25, 2005
- January 12, 2005
- January 8, 2005
- January 2, 2005
- December 27, 2004
- December 14, 2004
- December 12, 2004
- December 12, 2004
- December 5, 2004
- October 11, 2004
- September 21, 2004
- September 20, 2004
- September 21, 2004
- September 20, 2004
- September 20, 2004
- July 29, 2004
- February 24, 2004
- January 23, 2004
- December 3, 2003
- November 26, 2003
- November 14, 2003
- October 19, 2003
- September 28, 2003
- September 28, 2003
- September 8, 2003
- August 12, 2003
- July 27, 2003
- July 25, 2003
- July 23, 2003
- May 2, 2003
- May 2, 2003
- May 2, 2003
- April 29, 2003
- April 26, 2003
- April 22, 2003
- April 14, 2003
- April 4, 2003
- February 2, 2003
- February 1, 2003
- December 20, 2002
- December 4, 2002
- December 3, 2002
- November 26, 2002
- November 25, 2002
- November 25, 2002
- November 25, 2002
- November 25, 2002
- November 25, 2002
- November 23, 2002
- November 16, 2002
- November 8, 2002
- October 5, 2002
- October 3, 2002
- September 26, 2002
- September 25, 2002
- September 19, 2002
|
|
|
 |
Indianapolis Star Editorial
Jail Plan Moves in Right Direction
December 7, 2005
Our position: The proposal to transfer women is a small and uncertain step toward the ultimate jail solution. Moving nonviolent female inmates -- or any nonviolent inmates -- out of the Marion County Jail and into a private rehabilitation facility makes perfect sense on paper. Whether Sheriff Frank Anderson's plan for the mass transfer will make a dent in the jail's chronic overcrowding problem remains to be tested. The cost of serving the women in Liberty Hall has not been determined, for starters. Nor is it clear whether substantial new space can be created at that Downtown agency to accommodate some 250 women without displacing large numbers of the male inmates who now receive a constellation of services there to smooth their return to society. Even if the move is successful, it amounts to one more shuffle and one more Band-Aid for a jail that has had to grant premature release to more than 10,000 prisoners since 2001 in order to comply with a federal court order capping its population. Some of those who've gotten out early have committed crimes; six were later charged with murder. Officials across the gamut of local government must continue moving toward a comprehensive, and inevitably costly, solution to an antiquated, overflowing, dangerous criminal justice plant, including courtrooms, jail space and various support facilities. Meanwhile, Anderson is doing what he can, and getting some bipartisan support (though the Democrat's critics in the GOP probably have a point about his duet with county prosecutor candidate Melina Kennedy in announcing the latest jail initiative). The approximately 250 inmates who would be eligible for Liberty Hall represent more than 90 percent of the jail's female population and have more than 400 children among them, Anderson said. His hope is that the array of rehabilitation services they would receive would make them better mothers, less likely to return to jail or to see the next generation run afoul of the law. His offer of hope deserves a try, particularly since it carries the potential bonus of freeing up desperately needed jail beds. But male and female offenders alike should be afforded transitional help, for the community's sake as well as their own. Like a safe, adequate place to keep prisoners and conduct the county's business, that requires not just inventiveness, but investment.
|
|