- December 10, 2006
- December 20, 2006
- August 7, 2006
- July 26, 2006
- July 16, 2006
- July 16, 2006
- July 16, 2006
- July 14, 2006
- June 6, 2006
- April 20, 2006
- March 25, 2006
- December 20, 2005
- December 19, 2005
- December 7, 2005
- December 4, 2005
- November 29, 2005
- November 28, 2005
- November 27, 2005
- November 28, 2005
- November 27, 2005
- November 25, 2005
- November 20, 2005
- November 20, 2005
- November 21, 2005
- November 5, 2005
- September 23, 2005
- September 1, 2005
- August 9, 2005
- July 23, 2005
- July 18, 2005
- June 21, 2005
- June 21, 2005
- June 17, 2005
- June 16, 2005
- June 12, 2005
- June 7, 2005
- May 25, 2005
- May 18, 2005
- March 16, 2005
- April 18, 2005
- April 11, 2005
- March 23, 2005
- March 22, 2005
- March 21, 2005
- March 21, 2005
- March 16, 2005
- March 12, 2005
- March 12, 2005
- February 16, 2005
- February 7, 2005
- February 4, 2005
- January 27, 2005
- January 25, 2005
- January 12, 2005
- January 8, 2005
- January 2, 2005
- December 27, 2004
- December 14, 2004
- December 12, 2004
- December 12, 2004
- December 5, 2004
- October 11, 2004
- September 21, 2004
- September 20, 2004
- September 21, 2004
- September 20, 2004
- September 20, 2004
- July 29, 2004
- February 24, 2004
- January 23, 2004
- December 3, 2003
- November 26, 2003
- November 14, 2003
- October 19, 2003
- September 28, 2003
- September 28, 2003
- September 8, 2003
- August 12, 2003
- July 27, 2003
- July 25, 2003
- July 23, 2003
- May 2, 2003
- May 2, 2003
- May 2, 2003
- April 29, 2003
- April 26, 2003
- April 22, 2003
- April 14, 2003
- April 4, 2003
- February 2, 2003
- February 1, 2003
- December 20, 2002
- December 4, 2002
- December 3, 2002
- November 26, 2002
- November 25, 2002
- November 25, 2002
- November 25, 2002
- November 25, 2002
- November 25, 2002
- November 23, 2002
- November 16, 2002
- November 8, 2002
- October 5, 2002
- October 3, 2002
- September 26, 2002
- September 25, 2002
- September 19, 2002
|
|
|
 |
February 2, 2003 Indianapolis Star
Letter to the Editor
State's judges are due for a pay raise
February 2, 2003
The state's strength can be measured by many factors: families, schools, health care, employment and the economy. These are vitally important, but without a first-rate judicial system, all is at risk. We in Indiana have been fortunate to have a judiciary with many talented and dedicated public servants. But with sub-par judicial pay, we are neglecting the present and risking the future. Our judges enter the legal profession as lawyers after a rigorous and expensive law school education, often incurring six figures of debt. By the time they are elected judges, most are raising families and trying to fund education for their children. Yet, our judicial pay ranks 47th in the nation. Our judges are entering their seventh year without a pay raise, losing $10,000 of buying power in the interim. Kentucky's trial court judges are paid over $23,000 a year more than their Indiana counterparts. As a result, fewer private practitioners, prosecutors and defenders can afford to pursue an Indiana judgeship, thus narrowing the talent pool. And experienced judges have strong incentives not to stay on the bench and serve the public. The proposed legislation to adjust judicial pay would restore Indiana to the middle of the pack nationally in judicial pay. Moreover, that adjustment would come through court user fees. Two years ago, the legislature passed a similar judicial-pay adjustment package, but it was vetoed. The need for enhanced judicial pay in Indiana is even greater today. On behalf of the more than 4,000 members of the Indianapolis Bar Association, I encourage the legislature and governor to restore judicial pay to reasonable levels.
John R. Maley
Past president
Indianapolis Bar Association
|
|